Thread:Cyprum xecuii/@comment-6191693-20130314043738/@comment-6191693-20130317015346

What do you mean I sound harsh?

I'm not sure which tanks are which in your diagram (I wasn't able to follow the way you described them and I can't read your labels because they're not in the Latin alphabet), but I can say that the first two on the top row, the one in the second row, and the one in the fourth row all look OK, at least at first glance. The huge one at the bottom I could maybe see if it had an absolutely huge steam engine (no other power source could possibly move it), if its armor were fairly inadequately thin (to cut back on the already monumental weight), and if it creeped along at an frustratingly slow speed.

My criticism of the ones in the third row and of the WWII tanks is that their shape (lots of angles to deflect incoming fire), what appears to be more modern armor materials, a modern-looking suspension setup, and a relatively nimble-looking turret structure, are all far too advanced for something that's supposed to be relatively new technology and having been built in the first decade of the twentieth century.