Board Thread:Watercooler 2.0/@comment-6908728-20131117224425/@comment-6209322-20131118171606

Well put-together response, Vjiay. In my answer, I will bold and put quotation marks around the parts of your response that I am referencing, so as to make it easier to follow who is talking.

RE: +/- 6,000 year old earth --

' "First, there’s no biblical evidence for evolution or that the earth is older than 6,000 years either." '

Fair enough, though that number is arrived at using geneologies that are in the Bible, and guesstimating what exactly constitutes a 'generation' in terms of years. But regardless, the Bible does talk about homosexuality, in both the Old Testament  a few times in Leviticus, and in the New Testament in I Cor. 6:9-10 (quite harshly), and again in Romans 1:26-28. It's not like we have to guess at what God thinks about Homosexuality.

RE: Humanists and Homosexuality -- I speceifically said I found it interesting that humanists who argued homosexuality was purely genetic didn't make sense (I know several). Your argument is consistant, but it means that a person who is homosexual can change, which is something my humanist friends do not wish to accept -- so I thank you for the two sources (I already had the Psych Association, but the pediatric source will also be useful, and I think it's more forceful.  Anyways, I take no issue with your stance and your reasoning.  It is consistant.  EDIT* Id love to see you and the other guys go at it >:D